一、 漏洞 CVE-2024-46734 基础信息
漏洞标题
Btrfs:修复使用相同文件描述符时直接IO写入和fsync之间的竞态条件
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
漏洞描述信息
N/A
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
CVSS信息
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
漏洞类别
使用共享资源的并发执行不恰当同步问题(竞争条件)
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
漏洞标题
btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
漏洞描述信息
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd If we have 2 threads that are using the same file descriptor and one of them is doing direct IO writes while the other is doing fsync, we have a race where we can end up either: 1) Attempt a fsync without holding the inode's lock, triggering an assertion failures when assertions are enabled; 2) Do an invalid memory access from the fsync task because the file private points to memory allocated on stack by the direct IO task and it may be used by the fsync task after the stack was destroyed. The race happens like this: 1) A user space program opens a file descriptor with O_DIRECT; 2) The program spawns 2 threads using libpthread for example; 3) One of the threads uses the file descriptor to do direct IO writes, while the other calls fsync using the same file descriptor. 4) Call task A the thread doing direct IO writes and task B the thread doing fsyncs; 5) Task A does a direct IO write, and at btrfs_direct_write() sets the file's private to an on stack allocated private with the member 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true; 6) Task B enters btrfs_sync_file() and sees that there's a private structure associated to the file which has 'fsync_skip_inode_lock' set to true, so it skips locking the inode's VFS lock; 7) Task A completes the direct IO write, and resets the file's private to NULL since it had no prior private and our private was stack allocated. Then it unlocks the inode's VFS lock; 8) Task B enters btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging(), then the assertion that checks the inode's VFS lock is held fails, since task B never locked it and task A has already unlocked it. The stack trace produced is the following: assertion failed: inode_is_locked(&inode->vfs_inode), in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:983! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 9 PID: 5072 Comm: worker Tainted: G U OE 6.10.5-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 69f48d427608e1c09e60ea24c6c55e2ca1b049e8 Hardware name: Acer Predator PH315-52/Covini_CFS, BIOS V1.12 07/28/2020 RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs] Code: 50 d6 86 c0 e8 (...) RSP: 0018:ffff9e4a03dcfc78 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000054 RBX: ffff9078a9868e98 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff907dce4a7800 RDI: ffff907dce4a7800 RBP: ffff907805518800 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff9e4a03dcfb38 R10: ffff9e4a03dcfb30 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffff907684ae7800 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff90774646b600 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f04b96006c0(0000) GS:ffff907dce480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f32acbfc000 CR3: 00000001fd4fa005 CR4: 00000000003726f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x24 ? die+0x2e/0x50 ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? btrfs_get_ordered_extents_for_logging.cold+0x1f/0x42 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] btrfs_sync_file+0x21a/0x4d0 [btrfs bb26272d49b4cdc847cf3f7faadd459b62caee9a] ? __seccomp_filter+0x31d/0x4f0 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x4f/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160 ? do_futex+0xcb/0x190 ? __x64_sys_futex+0x10e/0x1d0 ? switch_fpu_return+0x4f/0xd0 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x72/0x220 ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mod ---truncated---
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS信息
N/A
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
漏洞类别
N/A
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
漏洞标题
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
来源:中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
漏洞描述信息
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于使用相同 fd 时直接 IO 写入和 fsync 之间存在竞争。
来源:中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS信息
N/A
来源:中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
漏洞类别
其他
来源:中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
二、漏洞 CVE-2024-46734 的公开POC
# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
三、漏洞 CVE-2024-46734 的情报信息
  • 标题: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree -- 🔗来源链接

    标签:

  • 标题: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree -- 🔗来源链接

    标签:

  • 标题: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree -- 🔗来源链接

    标签:

  • 标题: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree -- 🔗来源链接

    标签:

  • 标题: btrfs: fix race between direct IO write and fsync when using same fd - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree -- 🔗来源链接

    标签:

  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-46734