一、 漏洞 CVE-2025-37816 基础信息
漏洞标题
梅:修复由counted_by()非法使用导致的fortify-panic问题
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
漏洞描述信息
N/A
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
CVSS信息
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
漏洞类别
内存缓冲区边界内操作的限制不恰当
来源:AIGC 神龙大模型
漏洞标题
mei: vsc: Fix fortify-panic caused by invalid counted_by() use
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
漏洞描述信息
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mei: vsc: Fix fortify-panic caused by invalid counted_by() use gcc 15 honors the __counted_by(len) attribute on vsc_tp_packet.buf[] and the vsc-tp.c code is using this in a wrong way. len does not contain the available size in the buffer, it contains the actual packet length *without* the crc. So as soon as vsc_tp_xfer() tries to add the crc to buf[] the fortify-panic handler gets triggered: [ 80.842193] memcpy: detected buffer overflow: 4 byte write of buffer size 0 [ 80.842243] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 272 at lib/string_helpers.c:1032 __fortify_report+0x45/0x50 ... [ 80.843175] __fortify_panic+0x9/0xb [ 80.843186] vsc_tp_xfer.cold+0x67/0x67 [mei_vsc_hw] [ 80.843210] ? seqcount_lockdep_reader_access.constprop.0+0x82/0x90 [ 80.843229] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x7c/0x110 [ 80.843250] mei_vsc_hw_start+0x98/0x120 [mei_vsc] [ 80.843270] mei_reset+0x11d/0x420 [mei] The easiest fix would be to just drop the counted-by but with the exception of the ack buffer in vsc_tp_xfer_helper() which only contains enough room for the packet-header, all other uses of vsc_tp_packet always use a buffer of VSC_TP_MAX_XFER_SIZE bytes for the packet. Instead of just dropping the counted-by, split the vsc_tp_packet struct definition into a header and a full-packet definition and use a fixed size buf[] in the packet definition, this way fortify-source buffer overrun checking still works when enabled.
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS信息
N/A
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
漏洞类别
N/A
来源:美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
二、漏洞 CVE-2025-37816 的公开POC
# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
三、漏洞 CVE-2025-37816 的情报信息